• vor 4 Tage


    This stuff scares me a bit as I don't have the ability to visualize anything.  Apparently this skill is ubiquitous enough that the idea that one may not be capable of doing this stuff doesn't come up.  So what can one do in this spot?  Well I guess one can improve the workaround for this, conceptualizing the pieces, which is a skill that seems to benefit from practice at least.  Going beyond just a few moves is tough as you have to remember how it all fits together without seeing it.  That's what I call blindfolded :)

  • vor 4 Monate



  • vor 7 Monate


    how to you get to part2 of board visualization lecture with dany rensch

  • vor 7 Monate


  • vor 11 Monate


    Thanks for a wonerful video and for sharing your detailed research about board visualization. 

    If anyone would like to learn how to play Blindfold Chess in a step-by-step systematic way - read the blog post:   http://www.chess.com/blog/Samantha212/playing-blindfold-chess-with-your-mind-wide-open


  • vor 11 Monate


    Hey all "full board awareness" fans.. I'm developing an app for ios/android/windows that uses many of the ideas presented here (among others).  www.blindfoldchesstrainer.com . PM me with feedback!  

  • vor 11 Monate


    do you retrear in endgame

  • vor 12 Monate


    I don't want to be electric shocked.FrownWink.  Nice video, I loved it.

  • vor 13 Monate


  • vor 16 Monate


    This video is a piece of .........gold, hidden away on chess.com

  • vor 20 Monate


    Just found that one of the shared decks on anki flashcards, has a deck for learning the colours of the squares. Just in case you don't have someone willing to test your visualisation. The program is free to download and use..... https://ankiweb.net

  • vor 21 Monate


    @mythas wow you just nailed it on the head for me, thank you so much! Your exercise focuses more on pure visualisation than just counting the letters and numbers, also very creative.

  • vor 21 Monate


    For working on the diagonals I have been playing "Bishop pong" in my head. Start with an imaginary bishop on any perimeter square then send it down a diagonal and say the next perimeter square it hits, then bounce it of the edge as if it were a ball and keep going around the board till its stuck in your head (ex. a2 -> g8 -> h7 -> b1 -> a2 ... ). Then move to a new start square and repeat.

    To make it harder you can start putting imaginary wall across ranks or files to limit the movement of the piece (eg. have a wall along the g file so a bishop on a2 goes a2 -> f7 -> e8 -> a4 -> d1 -> f3 -> a8 -> then back the way it came).

    Playing this game has helped me a lot more than just reciting diagonals as the simple add/subtract 1 from each coordinate seems more like a counting exercise than a visualization one.

  • vor 22 Monate

    IM DanielRensch

    Whatever you're comfortable with Dark_Passanger

    I don't think it's that important at first, as long as you are building the muscles!


  • vor 22 Monate


    I think this was the first video I watched on chess.com. It's a good way to start off

  • vor 23 Monate


    Danny, when you are just starting working on the visualization - should you do it with your eyes open or closed? Does it make a difference? When you visualize the board, do you see the whole board, or just a certain part of the board? Also, when you are seeing the board - is it a 2d board, or a 3d board? Lol, not sure if what I'm asking makes sense to anyone. 

  • vor 23 Monate

    IM DanielRensch

    You guys have all provided such amazing, in depth, thoughtful feedback! I need to make another video with some of the ideas that have been given here Laughing!!!


  • vor 23 Monate


    You can train and use this as your training partner for visualization skills 


  • vor 2 Jahre


    For another way to make the intangible, tangible, you can try this method too. It worked for me:


  • vor 2 Jahre


    Thought I'd share a few tidbits that seem to help me learn to visualize the board, as my brain is more "language" oriented and less "picture" oriented. In other words, I'll do better with a set of instructions written in English than I will with a set of instructions mainly consisting of diagrams. I suspect there are others like me, so I thought I'd share. Here goes:

    The a, c, e, and g files are identical (dark square on first rank, light square on the second, etc.), as are the b, d, f, and h files. Likewise, the odd ranks (1, 3, 5, and 7) are all identical, as are the even ranks.

    Thus, one can arrange the squares into four groups: One) a, c, e, g odd (e.g. a1, c3, e5, g7) squares, which are all dark; Two) b, d, f, h odd squares, which are all light; Three) a, c, e, g even squares, which are all light; and Four) b, d, f, h even squares, which are all dark.

    A corresponding, or "brother" square will always be in the group that is most different from the original square's group. For example, the corresponding square to a1 (in the a, c, e, g odd group) is h8 (in the b, d, f, g even group) Corresponding squares to those in the a, c, e, g even group will always be in the b, d, f, h odd group.

    It also helps me to think of the 64-square board as a set of four identical 16-square boards, the first little board, bottom left, is  bounded by a1, a4, d1, and d4, the second one, upper left, is bounded by a5, a8, d5, and d8, the third one, bottom right, is bounded by e1, e4, h1, and h4, and the last one is, well, you know. In each of these smaller (16 square) boards, the bottom left  and upper right corner squares are dark, and the upper left and bottom right corner squares are light.

    Recognizing these relationships helps me to learn to see the board in the first place, so that I can get better at knowing the squares and seeing the board in my mind's eye without thinking. I don't focus on these things when I'm trying to visualize and calculate chess moves.

    You folks who learn better with pictures and images will probably wonder what I've been smoking, but I hope these ramblings are helpful to somebody whose learning style might be similar to mine. If not, please forgive me for wasting your time. 

    And thanks to Danny Rensch for a couple of terrific visualization videos!

Nach oben

Antwort senden: