14564 Spieler sind gerade online!
Mensch gegen Maschine - viel Glück!
Fernschach mit freier Zeiteinteilung
Gemeinsam analysieren und für den besten Zug abstimmen
Hast du das Zeug dazu?
Backgammon, Knobeln und vieles mehr!
Schärfe deinen taktischen Blick!
Tipps und Tricks rund ums Schach
Lerne von Topspielern & Profis!
Millionen von Meisterpartien!
Dein virtueller Schachtrainer!
Feile an deinen Eröffnungen!
Teste und trainiere dein Können gegen den Computer!
Finde den richtigen privaten Trainer für dich!
Kannst du sie jeden Tag lösen?
Komplettpläne: Schach lernen, vertiefen und trainieren!
Finde Freunde & spiele im Team!
Neues aus der Welt des Schachs!
Finde Vereine und Veranstaltungen in deiner Nähe!
Wer von deinen Freunden ist der Beste?
Lies, was andere Mitglieder sagen!
Thanks GM Melkset verry good .
i would have never seen the 4th and winning idea if not for this video, incredibly instructive video
After going thru this series a few times, MSK chess: Has this great video 20/20 Calculation on Youtube that has helped me tremendously. Good for beginers and intermediate chess players understanding of the series of Calculation. Hope it helps, Here is the link- https://youtu.be/5ybeT02z39E?t=1m12s
Thanks again Grandmaster Melik.
Brilliant, thank you!
Instructive :) Thank you, GM Khachiyan! :)
Youre the best Melik
Maybe it was worth showing one more tactical issue of how to react after 3... d2 4. Rd7
Although Melik might thought this is too obvious that white can't take the rook by 4... Rxd7 because of 5. Qc8+ 5... Kg7 (5... Rd8 6. Qxd8+ Kg7 Qd7+ picking up the pawn) 6. Qxd7+ following by Qxd2. And that white doesn't have any tricks after 4... d1Q because of Queen-Queen-Rook connections.
In my opinion, it is no more and no less obvious than the majority of other tactical peculiarities of decision making in this video. But maybe I'm wrong, and it doesn't even worth mentioning. Or maybe I'm just missing something simple in my own calculations.
11:30 yeah even if I don't see the entire continuation, only the first 3-5 moves and it seems to be good, I'll make that move and figure out the rest afterwards. figured that must be what people do, nothing else seems practical or reasonable. problem I am having sometimes is finding the lines that actually give advantage rather than the lines that merely keep everything equal (with best play from both sides).
Great video Melik :)
@fanofcarlsen GM Khachiyan introduced the principles of critical squares and indirect response. These seem to be central notions to this video, notions that I would assume are largely foreign to (y)our decision making process over the board. Although I've appreciated nearly every video on this site, his structured approach to decision making and plan formulating has won my loyalty as a student.
I like it, Thanks GM.
I really enjoyed this video, but I do not understand how your way of calculating is at all "different". You looked at 4 candidate moves, and analyzed them and picked the best one. What is different about this approach from the usual way?
@FanOfCarlsen I'm guessing you probably feel like a lot of the chess videos on this website are not useful to you because they feature positions that we simply don't get to most often, and on the rare occasions when we do get to some of the presented positions, our opponents think and play entirely differently. Is this a fair assessment of the difficulty you are experiencing?
Everybody is saying very good to this video.. but what is he doing after all.. he has taken a specific situation on the board and showing different lines. Does this teach anything about how to think when we have some position in front of us? How to find candidate moves and how to calculate variations effectively? Which lines to leave without calculation? Nothing!! BAD video..
thank you Grandmaster.
Important line regarding the position at 18:36:
Kh7 Qf7+ (instead of Qe7+) Kh6 Qf4+ Kg7 Qe5+ Kh7 and white eventually runs out of checks.
Very interesting!! I have a question: if you had 3 hours a day to spend studying chess, what would you do in order to progress and not only enjoy playing? I'm having real trouble getting over 1900, and I'm spending lots of time with openings (mainly with chess position trainer) and some with chess problems. Also: would you study more opening in the basics or just a few but deeply?
Thanks a lot!!! Great videos and teaching skills!
von GM Melikset Khachiyan
Today Grandmaster Khachiyan begins a new series on the subject of concrete, accurate calculation and how important it is to have this approach when trying to convert and advantage. Often when your opponent has pressure (as white does on the seventh rank in this game), only precise, deep calculation can save your won game. Learn from World Champ Euwe and enjoy the show!
Spieler: Alexander, Conel Hughes
- Euwe, Max
Schlüsselstellung gegen den Computer spielen
Diamant-Mitglieder erhalten unbegrenzten Zugriff auf die gesamte Video-Schachunterricht - Bibliothek! Upgrade deinen Account noch heute - du liegst 100% auf der sicheren Seite mit einer 30-tägigen Geld-zurück-Garantie ohne wenn und aber!
GM Melikset Khachiyan
Melik began playing chess at the age of 8, won the Baku Junior Championship two years later and became a Soviet Candidate Master two years after that. He began coaching early in his career and has brought up three Junior World Champions (among them Levon Aronian). In 2001, he immigrated to the US, where he qualified to play in the U.S. Championship several times. He earned his Grandmaster title in 2006.
Warum Mitglied werden? | Schachthemen |
Über uns |
Hilfe & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Schach - Deutsch
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!