11885 Spieler sind gerade online!
Mensch gegen Maschine - viel Glück!
Fernschach mit freier Zeiteinteilung
Gemeinsam analysieren und für den besten Zug abstimmen
Hast du das Zeug dazu?
Schärfe deinen taktischen Blick!
Tipps und Tricks rund ums Schach
Lerne von Topspielern & Profis!
Millionen von Meisterpartien!
Dein virtueller Schachtrainer!
Feile an deinen Eröffnungen!
Teste und trainiere dein Können gegen den Computer!
Finde den richtigen privaten Trainer für dich!
Kannst du sie jeden Tag lösen?
Komplettpläne: Schach lernen, vertiefen und trainieren!
Finde Freunde & spiele im Team!
Neues aus der Welt des Schachs!
Finde Vereine und Veranstaltungen in deiner Nähe!
Wer von deinen Freunden ist der Beste?
Lies, was andere Mitglieder sagen!
Your complaint is u won two games pretty much the same way ? Sounds like back door bragging.
Ha, thats funny. The reason I brought it up is because I have seen weak engines do similar kind of stuff, where they find themselves in a lost situation and make a non sense move, because there is no solution. I just wanted to bring up the topic that it is possible for people to cheat with a weak engine, and get away with it. Because the appearance is that they are not cheating, because people do beat them. This post has nothing to do with bragging....If I was bragging, I would have posted the game in the "game showcase" forum. I have nothing to "brag" about in this game, considering how silly the opponent movement was.
Accusing somebody of cheating in public is against the rules as much as the act of cheating itself. I know that you did not give his name, but it would be easy for anyone to find that game in your records.
By the way I could make the same mistake twice, expecially if I played a lot and/or I did not sleep.
Nao83, it would be impossible for someone to view my history and find these games, as I play many 3-0 blitz games, and his games have not been in my history since they have been wiped out. But thank you for the post, I agree...I have done similar mistakes where I find myself in the same opening trap because I wasn't sure what to do. So, considering everyones thoughts, I have decided that there is no real way to determine if he was cheating, only suspicion, which is not at all conclusive. Actually, he probably wasn't cheating. This is the purpose of the forum, to clear up any misconceptions and discuss ethical practice.
I used to have old computer chess boards that played relatively well till they didn't. They would make the same blunder in a position over and over. You had to avoid that line to get a decent game. Having said that, the mistake in the games posted is tricky. If he did not analyze his game he could have figured he should not have taken with his knight without realizing he needed to prevent that position much sooner.
but i know where he is coming from. i played some people and thought they played original till i found out chessmaster had the exact same playing style. but maybe coincidence you never know.
Best Way to Study the Endgame
von hpmobil vor wenige Minuten
5/7/2015 - Mate in 5
von PC1501 vor 4 Minuten
Best Way to Learn every Chess Opening
von GnrfFrtzl vor 4 Minuten
Consistency in chess and our thought process.
von robbie_1969 vor 8 Minuten
Carlsen, Caruana & Yifan: a ratings analysis
von Azukikuru vor 13 Minuten
what if I have fide rating?
von Pulpofeira vor 14 Minuten
Attacking and Aggresive Chess
von Quiksilverau vor 17 Minuten
Bobby Fischer or Magnus Carlsen
von Elroch vor 19 Minuten
4/22/2015 - Mate in 3
von pgherode vor 23 Minuten
My collection of Mikhail Tal's best match
von tkbunny vor 27 Minuten
Warum Mitglied werden? | Schachthemen |
Über uns |
Hilfe & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Schach - Deutsch
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!