14244 Spieler sind gerade online!
Mensch gegen Maschine - viel Glück!
Fernschach mit freier Zeiteinteilung
Gemeinsam analysieren und für den besten Zug abstimmen
Hast du das Zeug dazu?
Schärfe deinen taktischen Blick!
Tipps und Tricks rund ums Schach
Lerne von Topspielern & Profis!
Millionen von Meisterpartien!
Dein virtueller Schachtrainer!
Feile an deinen Eröffnungen!
Teste und trainiere dein Können gegen den Computer!
Finde den richtigen privaten Trainer für dich!
Kannst du sie jeden Tag lösen?
Komplettpläne: Schach lernen, vertiefen und trainieren!
Der Startpunkt für Anfänger
Finde Freunde & spiele im Team!
Neues aus der Welt des Schachs!
Vereine & Veranstaltungen
Wer von deinen Freunden ist der Beste?
Lies, was andere Mitglieder sagen!
Some are easy, while some are hard (not so obvious). What is the best way to solve mate in two? Other than knowing tactics, is there a certain strategy?
Well, composed puzzle are not so much about tactics as about "themes".
You probabl have to approach them differently from regular positions. Many have very little basis in reality. I always say puzzles are not chess, but a seperate discipline using the rules of chess.
I guess if ou understand all or some of the themes, you might spot the patterns easier
I practice mate puzzles to help my tactical vision without moving pieces. How differently?
Lemme give ou an example. This puzzle, (like many others) is more about the composer trying to accomplish a task, and not setting a problem for a solver.
This is a theme called starflights. The black king is on e2 (the centre of the star) d1, f1, d3, f3 are the points of the stars. If the king escapes to any of these squares, there is a seperate and different mate for each square.
Well, mate is when you give check and the opponent can't evade it.
So - the second move has to be a check. Now what has to happen in the first move to get a mate for your check? -> Make sure the checking piece can't be taken or blocked and the king can't run away, either ...
Not that simple. Some mates are forced, meaning you have to check your opponent on the first move then give mate. But alot are not so obvious.
First try calculating all checks, captures, and mate in 1 threats on the board. Write out your calculations, then check your analysis against the answer to see what you missed. Usually it is something pretty basic, like not considering all checks, or say missing a pin.
There are also many good books on solving composed problems/studies. The classic is Howard's 'How to Solve Chess Problems'. I also like Taverner's 'Chess Problems Made Easy'. Nunn's 'Solving in Style' is supposed to be good too, and is on my wish list. I'm sure there are many others.
Even though composed problems are certainly artificial, the solutions are 100% tactical.
"Q & A with Coach Dan Heisman"
Group help II
von maxcoorn vor wenige Minuten
Chess.com pippin off credit cards
von ozzie_c_cobblepot vor wenige Minuten
who has the most number of friends on chess.com?
von princeofindia678 vor 4 Minuten
Making stupid moves when I'm short on time
von bhenderson001 vor 4 Minuten
von trysts vor 4 Minuten
Rate the username above
von Graywacke vor 8 Minuten
1,000 signs you play chess too much.
von SommacalPat vor 8 Minuten
Wives of Chess Players
von please_let_me_win vor wenige Minuten
why does magnus go to the lavatory so often during his games?
von MikeH76 vor 12 Minuten
Can't move pieces in Chess Mentor/Tactic Trainer
von SandDime vor 12 Minuten
Warum Mitglied werden? | Schachthemen |
Über uns |
Hilfe & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Schach - Deutsch
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!