13829 Spieler sind gerade online!
Mensch gegen Maschine - viel Glück!
Fernschach mit freier Zeiteinteilung
Gemeinsam analysieren und für den besten Zug abstimmen
Hast du das Zeug dazu?
Schärfe deinen taktischen Blick!
Tipps und Tricks rund ums Schach
Lerne von Topspielern & Profis!
Millionen von Meisterpartien!
Dein virtueller Schachtrainer!
Feile an deinen Eröffnungen!
Teste und trainiere dein Können gegen den Computer!
Finde den richtigen privaten Trainer für dich!
Kannst du sie jeden Tag lösen?
Komplettpläne: Schach lernen, vertiefen und trainieren!
Der Startpunkt für Anfänger
Finde Freunde & spiele im Team!
Neues aus der Welt des Schachs!
Vereine & Veranstaltungen
Wer von deinen Freunden ist der Beste?
Lies, was andere Mitglieder sagen!
Hi! I've not been playing long (played a bit when I was a kid, and enjoying playing again now, despite the odd moment of head-banging stupidity). Had a game against a higher-ranked opponent, and I thought that towards the end I had what should have been a game-winning advantage. Would anyone like to tell me where I went wrong (either in the end game or earlier - I know there are a few foul-ups in there).
I've added notes through the game, as best I can remember. I figure that at turn 40 I should have a decisive advantage, but fluffed it. And 49.b5 was a mistake I'm still kicking myself over.
I won't comment on every single little thing.
13. Bxc2, forget the knight on d6, trap it, attack it, whatever. I'll just take the pawn. White's development stinks.
20...g5 is a bad move. 21.gxf4 gives you very crappy pawns on the kingside. Anything but this.
40... At this point, you can win a pawn back and it appears like you should win.
47....Nxh3+ now you must be winning.
49...Kd6 looks like one way. The endgame is a bit tricky though.
46 Nxh3+ seems better...? But I am not certain of it.
Thanks, Bonesy1116. I didn't really think about pawn structure from 20.g5, but now you mention it it seems obvious that that would make a mess of things.
Thanks jonnin. I wasn't sure about the rook swap, especially with a pawn race going on, but I figured that the knight advantage would count for more with the rooks off the board. I was also a bit worried that I couldn't defend my pawns from a rook as easily as he could, as mine were in a terrible arrangement and distant from the King.
It is difficult to defend against multiple pawns by just having a knight. You must play precisely to win. It's a better decision to keep the rooks on the board as they are better defenders and can counterattack very easily.
I think 54... f6 looks like a mistake. 54... Nxb4 55. d6 a5 might work for a tricky draw.
Russian Farmer Chigorin Fan
von PatzerEternal vor wenige Minuten
How many knight + bishop endgame mates have actually happened in your games ?
von Scottrf vor wenige Minuten
Which book on tactics? - Chernev vs Nunn vs Weteschnik
von Xeelfiar vor wenige Minuten
12/6/2013 - Mate in 8
von damongross vor wenige Minuten
von blade13 vor 4 Minuten
CHESScom: Beautiful game, beautiful mate ... I did not expect!
von GR_OlegLider vor 4 Minuten
von ujifseven vor 5 Minuten
Creamed by expert
von TheGreatOogieBoogie vor 5 Minuten
The bad thing about chess is its fixed starting position.
von waffllemaster vor 7 Minuten
In defence of Blitz
von Ziryab vor 7 Minuten
Warum Mitglied werden? | Schachthemen |
Über uns |
Hilfe & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Schach - Deutsch
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!